Should say as well, this is the first longform review I written since reading pieces from @davidgbeer (https://t.co/s5qajalt1f) & @Des_Fitzgerald /Nicolas Langlitz (https://t.co/2npq4j3ACX) on the nature of book reviews and what they should be doing
@SimTulum Why stop there? More radical, more collaborative: (this whole conversation is worth reading - https://t.co/W2Q1pueYA5) https://t.co/m1PnS9WcEP
RT @ayo_wahlberg: Fascinating exchange on such an important genre - book reviews/forums can really shape the social lives of social science…
the ideal typical book review "should meet the text as an equal—which means being neither awed by the (anyway almost always imaginary) fame of the author, nor keen to establish the author/text as firmly beneath the reviewer"
RT @ayo_wahlberg: Fascinating exchange on such an important genre - book reviews/forums can really shape the social lives of social science…
Fascinating exchange on such an important genre - book reviews/forums can really shape the social lives of social science works. Nicolas did an amazing job and I'm looking forward to Des's version of a lively forum!