↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative health risk assessment of inhalation exposure to automobile foundry dust

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Geochemistry & Health, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Quantitative health risk assessment of inhalation exposure to automobile foundry dust
Published in
Environmental Geochemistry & Health, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10653-019-00277-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruipeng Tong, Mengzhao Cheng, Xiaofei Ma, Yunyun Yang, Yafei Liu, Jianfeng Li

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 20%
Engineering 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2019.
All research outputs
#8,144,013
of 13,514,491 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Geochemistry & Health
#226
of 481 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,529
of 297,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Geochemistry & Health
#19
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,514,491 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 481 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.