↓ Skip to main content

Effects of anticipatory perceptual simulation on practiced human-robot tasks

Overview of attention for article published in Autonomous Robots, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Effects of anticipatory perceptual simulation on practiced human-robot tasks
Published in
Autonomous Robots, December 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10514-009-9166-3
Authors

Guy Hoffman, Cynthia Breazeal

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Netherlands 2 2%
Canada 2 2%
Sweden 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Singapore 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 80 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 32%
Student > Master 23 24%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Librarian 3 3%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 5 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 34 36%
Computer Science 28 30%
Psychology 7 7%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Design 4 4%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 10 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2018.
All research outputs
#12,193,733
of 13,770,158 outputs
Outputs from Autonomous Robots
#415
of 428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,588
of 255,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Autonomous Robots
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,770,158 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 428 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.