| Title |
The influence of interviewers on survey responses among female sex workers in Zambia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-019-0703-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guy Harling, Michael M. Chanda, Katrina F. Ortblad, Magdalene Mwale, Steven Chongo, Catherine Kanchele, Nyambe Kamungoma, Leah G. Barresi, Till Bärnighausen, Catherine E. Oldenburg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 40% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 8% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Namibia | 1 | 4% |
| Nepal | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 52% |
| Scientists | 10 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 143 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Unknown | 62 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 12% |
| Psychology | 13 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 66 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,754,561
of 25,923,151 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#215
of 2,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,200
of 367,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#14
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,923,151 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,339 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.