↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Celestial Mechanics & Dynamical Astronomy, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
181 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Published in
Celestial Mechanics & Dynamical Astronomy, January 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1013939327465
Authors

P. K. Seidelmann (Chair), V. K. Abalakin, M. Bursa, M. E. Davies, C. de Bergh, J. H. Lieske, J. Oberst, J. L. Simon, E. M. Standish, P. Stooke, P. C. Thomas

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 7%
United Kingdom 1 4%
Unknown 24 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 37%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Student > Master 4 15%
Professor 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 11 41%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 22%
Engineering 5 19%
Unspecified 3 11%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 1 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2019.
All research outputs
#4,074,030
of 13,599,972 outputs
Outputs from Celestial Mechanics & Dynamical Astronomy
#92
of 304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,758
of 253,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Celestial Mechanics & Dynamical Astronomy
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,599,972 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.