↓ Skip to main content

Strategies of model-building in condensed matter physics: trade-offs as a demarcation criterion between physics and biology?

Overview of attention for article published in Synthese, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Strategies of model-building in condensed matter physics: trade-offs as a demarcation criterion between physics and biology?
Published in
Synthese, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11229-012-0145-4
Authors

Axel Gelfert

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 35%
Researcher 4 24%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Professor 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 8 47%
Mathematics 2 12%
Physics and Astronomy 2 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2019.
All research outputs
#14,908,870
of 23,133,982 outputs
Outputs from Synthese
#1,434
of 2,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,667
of 164,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthese
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,133,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.