| Title |
Integrating temporal refugia into landscapes of fear: prey exploit predator downtimes to forage in risky places
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00442-019-04381-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Justine A. Smith, Emiliano Donadio, Jonathan N. Pauli, Michael J. Sheriff, Arthur D. Middleton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 27% |
| Canada | 5 | 9% |
| Australia | 4 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 2% |
| Cayman Islands | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 30 | 54% |
| Members of the public | 23 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 187 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 40 | 21% |
| Researcher | 30 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Unknown | 40 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 85 | 45% |
| Environmental Science | 40 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2023.
All research outputs
#953,445
of 25,874,560 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#90
of 4,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,858
of 367,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#3
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,874,560 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,548 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.