↓ Skip to main content

The effect of mobile personalised texting versus non-personalised texting on the caries risk of underprivileged adults: a randomised control trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Oral Health, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
The effect of mobile personalised texting versus non-personalised texting on the caries risk of underprivileged adults: a randomised control trial
Published in
BMC Oral Health, March 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12903-019-0729-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Makiko Nishi, Virginia Kelleher, Michael Cronin, Finbarr Allen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 25%
Student > Bachelor 2 25%
Student > Master 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 38%
Unspecified 2 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Computer Science 1 13%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,825,479
of 13,122,094 outputs
Outputs from BMC Oral Health
#316
of 668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,650
of 250,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Oral Health
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,122,094 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 668 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them