↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses for cataract surgery and lens replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Graefe's Archive of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Effectiveness of multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses for cataract surgery and lens replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Graefe's Archive of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00417-018-04218-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sumitra S. Khandelwal, Jason J. Jun, Selene Mak, Marika Suttorp Booth, Paul G. Shekelle

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 25%
Other 3 25%
Student > Master 2 17%
Researcher 2 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 83%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2019.
All research outputs
#7,258,759
of 13,099,193 outputs
Outputs from Graefe's Archive of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology
#672
of 1,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,774
of 250,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Graefe's Archive of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology
#12
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,099,193 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,313 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.