↓ Skip to main content

Missing documents in Scopus: the case of the journal Enfermeria Nefrologica

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Missing documents in Scopus: the case of the journal Enfermeria Nefrologica
Published in
Scientometrics, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11192-019-03040-z
Authors

Erwin Krauskopf

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 29%
Librarian 2 29%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 29%
Engineering 2 29%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 14%
Social Sciences 1 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 14%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2019.
All research outputs
#960,629
of 13,505,887 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#210
of 1,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,565
of 253,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#10
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,505,887 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.