↓ Skip to main content

Missing documents in Scopus: the case of the journal Enfermeria Nefrologica

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Missing documents in Scopus: the case of the journal Enfermeria Nefrologica
Published in
Scientometrics, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11192-019-03040-z
Authors

Erwin Krauskopf

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 4 24%
Researcher 4 24%
Other 2 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Unknown 6 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 18%
Computer Science 2 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 8 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,612,324
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#307
of 2,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,831
of 352,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#5
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.