RT @MaartenvSmeden: Some of my favorite readings to rethink the motivations for and consequences of data-driven variable selection More re…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Some of my favorite readings to rethink the motivations for and consequences of data-driven variable selection More re…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Some of my favorite readings to rethink the motivations for and consequences of data-driven variable selection More re…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: @ADAlthousePhD I really like these four papers: https://t.co/bqgFN2LOd7 https://t.co/HFtgA2RGAj https://t.co/AZ2CjbCWNf…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Some of my favorite readings to rethink the motivations for and consequences of data-driven variable selection More re…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Some of my favorite readings to rethink the motivations for and consequences of data-driven variable selection More re…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: @ADAlthousePhD I really like these four papers: https://t.co/bqgFN2LOd7 https://t.co/HFtgA2RGAj https://t.co/AZ2CjbCWNf…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: @ADAlthousePhD I really like these four papers: https://t.co/bqgFN2LOd7 https://t.co/HFtgA2RGAj https://t.co/AZ2CjbCWNf…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Some of my favorite readings to rethink the motivations for and consequences of data-driven variable selection More re…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: @ADAlthousePhD I really like these four papers: https://t.co/bqgFN2LOd7 https://t.co/HFtgA2RGAj https://t.co/AZ2CjbCWNf…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: @ADAlthousePhD I really like these four papers: https://t.co/bqgFN2LOd7 https://t.co/HFtgA2RGAj https://t.co/AZ2CjbCWNf…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Some of my favorite readings to rethink the motivations for and consequences of data-driven variable selection More re…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: @ADAlthousePhD I really like these four papers: https://t.co/bqgFN2LOd7 https://t.co/HFtgA2RGAj https://t.co/AZ2CjbCWNf…
One of the reasons I like Twitter😀 I get to learn a lot!
RT @MaartenvSmeden: @ADAlthousePhD I really like these four papers: https://t.co/bqgFN2LOd7 https://t.co/HFtgA2RGAj https://t.co/AZ2CjbCWNf…
Some of my favorite readings to rethink the motivations for and consequences of data-driven variable selection More reading suggestions are highly appreciated
RT @MaartenvSmeden: @ADAlthousePhD I really like these four papers: https://t.co/bqgFN2LOd7 https://t.co/HFtgA2RGAj https://t.co/AZ2CjbCWNf…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: @ADAlthousePhD I really like these four papers: https://t.co/bqgFN2LOd7 https://t.co/HFtgA2RGAj https://t.co/AZ2CjbCWNf…
@ADAlthousePhD I really like these four papers: https://t.co/bqgFN2LOd7 https://t.co/HFtgA2RGAj https://t.co/AZ2CjbCWNf https://t.co/fR6fN2YV6k https://t.co/NSG7srb7xL
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @baumeister_se: Advise on confounder selection by VanderWeele https://t.co/KVgbjzVXR7
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @georg_henning: Interesting OA paper by Dr. Tyler J. VanderWeele in the European Journal of Epidemiology: "Principles of confounder sele…
Interesting OA paper by Dr. Tyler J. VanderWeele in the European Journal of Epidemiology: "Principles of confounder selection" https://t.co/jXoLm71bcz
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @DiazQuijanoFA: Causal diagrams for covariate selection can be useful when sufficient knowledge is available. However, data-driven stati…
RT @DiazQuijanoFA: Causal diagrams for covariate selection can be useful when sufficient knowledge is available. However, data-driven stati…
RT @DiazQuijanoFA: Causal diagrams for covariate selection can be useful when sufficient knowledge is available. However, data-driven stati…
Causal diagrams for covariate selection can be useful when sufficient knowledge is available. However, data-driven statistical approaches have also a role to confounder selection. #epitwitter #causalinference #epidemiology https://t.co/oJoNZ7cmND
to control for any pre-exposure covariate that is a cause of the exposure, or the outcome, or both. We will refer to this criterion as the “disjunctive cause criterion” https://t.co/ryWFHwknkp
Confounder selection 1) cause of the exposure/outcome: control 2) instrumental variable: exclude 3) common cause of both the exposure and the outcome: include as covariates https://t.co/ryWFHwknkp
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
Great essay on confounder selection in causal inference... https://t.co/doHVYvJ2zj
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @ivivek87: Indeed a great piece on principles of confounder selection via @MaartenvSmeden Relevant for multi-omics data integration for…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
Conditioning on the instrument will just make things worse.
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
Saving to #AbbeysEpiReadingList
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @ivivek87: Indeed a great piece on principles of confounder selection via @MaartenvSmeden Relevant for multi-omics data integration for…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…
Indeed a great piece on principles of confounder selection via @MaartenvSmeden Relevant for multi-omics data integration for causal inference or mechanistic association w/ phenotypic measurements. https://t.co/ACFUDlhROa #epitwitter #Statistics #Genomics
RT @MaartenvSmeden: Must read (if you haven’t already) for those of us who still use purely statistical criteria for confounder selection.…