↓ Skip to main content

Arthroscopic repair of HAGL lesions yields good clinical results, but may not allow return to former level of sport

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Arthroscopic repair of HAGL lesions yields good clinical results, but may not allow return to former level of sport
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00167-019-05414-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Uli Schmiddem, Adam Watson, Diana Perriman, Emmanouil Liodakis, Richard Page

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 40%
Student > Master 1 20%
Lecturer 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 40%
Computer Science 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Engineering 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2019.
All research outputs
#10,274,836
of 13,465,538 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#1,252
of 1,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,221
of 253,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#31
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,465,538 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.