↓ Skip to main content

Surgical technique for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus: tips, tricks and oncological results

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Surgical technique for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus: tips, tricks and oncological results
Published in
SpringerPlus, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40064-016-1825-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vital Hevia, Gaetano Ciancio, Victoria Gómez, Sara Álvarez, Víctor Díez-Nicolás, Francisco Javier Burgos

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 7 20%
Other 5 14%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 57%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,710,649
of 25,055,009 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#453
of 1,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,470
of 303,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#34
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,055,009 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.