↓ Skip to main content

Pathophysiology and imaging of heart failure in women with autoimmune rheumatic diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Heart Failure Reviews, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Pathophysiology and imaging of heart failure in women with autoimmune rheumatic diseases
Published in
Heart Failure Reviews, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10741-019-09779-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sophie I. Mavrogeni, George Markousis-Mavrogenis, Loukia Koutsogeorgopoulou, Theodoros Dimitroulas, Vasiliki Vartela, Angelos Rigopoulos, Michel Noutsias, Genovefa Kolovou

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Unspecified 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 86%
Unspecified 1 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2019.
All research outputs
#9,940,935
of 12,991,173 outputs
Outputs from Heart Failure Reviews
#199
of 291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,316
of 248,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart Failure Reviews
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,991,173 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 291 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.