RT @oceansresearch: @WhySharksMatter @C0PE That said, that’s an extremely rare occurrence. The biggest problem is finding great reviewers w…
@WhySharksMatter @C0PE That said, that’s an extremely rare occurrence. The biggest problem is finding great reviewers willing to volunteer to review 2-3 papers for every 1 they submit! [Ducks head for debate over society-published vs for-profit journals!]
RE: A better peer-review process? @JSSoftware @davidcshepherd #jssHappyHour: One idea: "Reciprocal" peer-review system: Authors of past papers should conduct high-quality reviews, so that they can submit later! There are papers such as: https://t.co/ILzYKl
RT @termiteGT: @SarahKnutie On the status of peer-review https://t.co/FZMi8woF7R in the age of #pay4reviews https://t.co/U06EnEJLDu
@SarahKnutie On the status of peer-review https://t.co/FZMi8woF7R in the age of #pay4reviews https://t.co/U06EnEJLDu
RT @Drfishchick: Interesting editorial on peer-review reciprocity. 2-3 reviews:1 publication is suggested. https://t.co/NsD6pPHD00
Interesting editorial on peer-review reciprocity. 2-3 reviews:1 publication is suggested. https://t.co/NsD6pPHD00
RT @TranielloLab: Peer-Reviewed Reciprocity https://t.co/ZjVsTUBLDZ
Currently have an invitation to review from BES in my inbox now (See BES editorial below re: declination rates on the rise)
RT @TranielloLab: Peer-Reviewed Reciprocity https://t.co/ZjVsTUBLDZ
RT @TranielloLab: Peer-Reviewed Reciprocity https://t.co/ZjVsTUBLDZ
RT @TranielloLab: Peer-Reviewed Reciprocity https://t.co/ZjVsTUBLDZ
Peer-Reviewed Reciprocity https://t.co/ZjVsTUBLDZ
RT @BehavEcolPapers: Peer-review reciprocity and commitment to manuscript evaluation https://t.co/AKaKbQqJm8 BES
RT @BehavEcolPapers: Peer-review reciprocity and commitment to manuscript evaluation https://t.co/AKaKbQqJm8 BES
Peer-review reciprocity and commitment to manuscript evaluation https://t.co/AKaKbQqJm8 BES