@TheDurtyTrowel @ArchaeoMapper There is definitely scope for a cognate article to this one: https://t.co/iyR8YbWDs5
@CJFrieman @ArchaeologyLisa @LisaLodwick @PeerCommunityIn @LoganCorina @Tash_Reynolds Right, I had the same thought: https://t.co/ZWmYY7aUSm
@PCI_Prehistory @josephlewis1992 Please reconsider. The term 'prehistory' has political dimensions especially in American & Australian archaeology, with the prehistory–history distinction representing a problematic civilized-savage concept. See https:/
RT @WorldPrehistory: @ArchaeoMapper 'prehistory is a complex, loaded term, understood variously' as I wrote in an article with an epigraph…
@ArchaeoMapper 'prehistory is a complex, loaded term, understood variously' as I wrote in an article with an epigraph from Chris Matthews on the 'coeval nature of prehistory with the present'. At Journal of World Prehistory we would rather evolve meanings
RT @WorldPrehistory: The majority of this rather small sample prefer BC/AD, as we do - we put the argument here: https://t.co/BSTxVetWM2 ht…
The majority of this rather small sample prefer BC/AD, as we do - we put the argument here: https://t.co/BSTxVetWM2 https://t.co/ZZyyl3P05R
RT @WorldPrehistory: Confusion at #10icaane with BC, bc, cal BC, italic cal BC (Bayesian interval), BCE, BP (1950), BP (B2k). Must update h…
Confusion at #10icaane with BC, bc, cal BC, italic cal BC (Bayesian interval), BCE, BP (1950), BP (B2k). Must update https://t.co/kMdnzZyGv4