↓ Skip to main content

The impact of phantom decoys on choices in cats

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The impact of phantom decoys on choices in cats
Published in
Animal Cognition, September 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10071-010-0350-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniele Scarpi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 49 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 20%
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 30%
Psychology 12 22%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 11%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 9 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2023.
All research outputs
#948,718
of 25,698,912 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#221
of 1,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,736
of 106,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,698,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,582 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them