↓ Skip to main content

The impact of phantom decoys on choices in cats

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The impact of phantom decoys on choices in cats
Published in
Animal Cognition, September 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10071-010-0350-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniele Scarpi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 5%
Australia 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 32 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 18%
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 34%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 11%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Philosophy 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 4 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2017.
All research outputs
#6,979,046
of 12,145,106 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#651
of 898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,574
of 292,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#25
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,145,106 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.3. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.