↓ Skip to main content

Identifying Outcome Measures for Coronary Artery Disease Value-Based Contracting Using the Delphi Method

Overview of attention for article published in Cardiology and Therapy, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Identifying Outcome Measures for Coronary Artery Disease Value-Based Contracting Using the Delphi Method
Published in
Cardiology and Therapy, March 2019
DOI 10.1007/s40119-019-0132-7
Authors

Lynn M. Neilson, Elizabeth C. S. Swart, Chester B. Good, William H. Shrank, Rochelle Henderson, Chronis Manolis, Natasha Parekh

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 50%
Unspecified 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2019.
All research outputs
#8,159,034
of 13,011,094 outputs
Outputs from Cardiology and Therapy
#53
of 117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,838
of 249,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiology and Therapy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,011,094 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 117 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them