@DrYGChung @LevSarkisov @LongLabCal I also commented on total, which is described in that paper. I don't really understand its purpose. I get that it equals absolute in small pores, but in large pore materials you'll just get a big number, without accounti
@BRBchemistry @LongLabCal I left out total as it's not one of the standard adsorption terms, although I mentioned it in another response (see below). It seems popular with MOFers, but I'm not sure a process engineer would know what it was. I'll post the ne
@dottiamadan Indeed. The NREL guys have their own definitions, which differ from those used more widely. We included these in the article below. I'm not sure I fully understand the rationale behind total, as it includes both adsorbed & non-adsorbed mol
RT @HidenIsochema: Last year "Outlook & challenges for H2 storage in nanoporous materials" was 2nd most accessed paper in Appl Phys A! htt…
Last year "Outlook & challenges for H2 storage in nanoporous materials" was 2nd most accessed paper in Appl Phys A! https://t.co/OSmWvVzSBl
.@Paperity, an aggregator of #OpenAccess content, is interesting. This is the entry for our #hydrogenstorage paper: https://t.co/vm949U75j6
RT @HidenIsochema: Outlook and challenges for #hydrogenstorage in #nanoporous #materials https://t.co/59TYyC9w9b Now available #openaccess
RT @HidenIsochema: Outlook and challenges for #hydrogenstorage in #nanoporous #materials https://t.co/59TYyC9w9b Now available #openaccess
Outlook and challenges for #hydrogenstorage in #nanoporous #materials https://t.co/59TYyC9w9b Now available #openaccess