↓ Skip to main content

Reliability of environmental sampling culture results using the negative binomial intraclass correlation coefficient

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Reliability of environmental sampling culture results using the negative binomial intraclass correlation coefficient
Published in
SpringerPlus, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-3-40
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharif S Aly, Jianyang Zhao, Ben Li, Jiming Jiang

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 27%
Researcher 5 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Other 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 18%
Engineering 4 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 9%
Psychology 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 6 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2015.
All research outputs
#6,464,609
of 12,440,396 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#472
of 1,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,229
of 277,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#19
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,440,396 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,728 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.