| Title |
Management of hyperkalemia in the acutely ill patient
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-019-0509-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
François Dépret, W. Frank Peacock, Kathleen D. Liu, Zubaid Rafique, Patrick Rossignol, Matthieu Legrand |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 306 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 59 | 19% |
| Spain | 31 | 10% |
| Colombia | 16 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 15 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 10 | 3% |
| Chile | 9 | 3% |
| Argentina | 7 | 2% |
| Peru | 5 | 2% |
| France | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 37 | 12% |
| Unknown | 113 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 264 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 28 | 9% |
| Scientists | 10 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 459 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 459 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 75 | 16% |
| Other | 63 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 52 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 8% |
| Researcher | 22 | 5% |
| Other | 78 | 17% |
| Unknown | 132 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 227 | 49% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 21 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 26 | 6% |
| Unknown | 146 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 211. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2024.
All research outputs
#186,588
of 25,617,409 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#14
of 1,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,047
of 368,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#1
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,617,409 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,205 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.