↓ Skip to main content

Biplane opening wedge high tibial osteotomy with a distal tuberosity osteotomy, radiological and clinical analysis with minimum follow‐up of 2 years

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Biplane opening wedge high tibial osteotomy with a distal tuberosity osteotomy, radiological and clinical analysis with minimum follow‐up of 2 years
Published in
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40634-019-0176-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juan Erquicia, Pablo Eduardo Gelber, Simone Perelli, Federico Ibañez, Maximiliano Ibañez, Xavier Pelfort, Juan Carlos Monllau

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Master 6 12%
Other 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 19 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 44%
Psychology 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 20 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2019.
All research outputs
#6,845,525
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#67
of 341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,319
of 353,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 341 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.