@mcxfrank @KouMurayama @stevenmweisberg If you are looking for effects within one language culture, you may want to look at the SNARC. In slower participants, it is larger. https://t.co/gFNPRG0xyo
@EikoFried Are there linguistic markedness effects for the colors involved or their attributes (brightness etc.)? I am asking, as such markedness effects can be relatively reliably observed for parity (odd/even) and response code (left/right). https://t.co
@NumCog There are many behavioral studies about handedness effects. For instance about our beloved MARC effect. We found it here: https://t.co/AiYW4OA16s and also in our large-scale internet study https://t.co/H6Oxz9ULBK , where we do not have a power pro
@ZackHawes8 @krzysztofcipora @EdNeuroLab @etoomari As regards evidence for the non-correlation of the SNARC with math, you find either direct evidence in our 2013 paper https://t.co/NPwBwas8mN or in our large-scale online study (no math test, only self rep
@a_kochari Hmm, One is Psych Research Paper by Huber et al. on compatibility effects and the second one on SNARC and MARC from Beh Res Methods https://t.co/c9DyW3bmaL The previous link was supposed to give free preview of the latter.
@a_kochari Looks really interesting. Good job! You can potentially find these two papers relevant for your work https://t.co/02v0GpSi9B https://t.co/eclnyxGSfC
RT @tuebang: Our largest SNARC (online) study ever is out with @Moji_Soli and @krzysztofcipora Main findings: 1. SNARC replicates online…
RT @krzysztofcipora: Here it is! Most likely the Biggest SNARC ever: https://t.co/02v0GpSi9B (N > 1000)
RT @action_brain: The SNARC effect, demonstrated more than 25 years ago, by @StanDehaene and colleagues, easily survives a massive online r…
RT @StanDehaene: No replication crisis for the SNARC effect ! 26 years later, large numbers map still onto the right, and small numbers ont…
Over 1000 participants over the web. Impressive.
RT @StanDehaene: No replication crisis for the SNARC effect ! 26 years later, large numbers map still onto the right, and small numbers ont…
RT @StanDehaene: No replication crisis for the SNARC effect ! 26 years later, large numbers map still onto the right, and small numbers ont…
RT @StanDehaene: No replication crisis for the SNARC effect ! 26 years later, large numbers map still onto the right, and small numbers ont…
The SNARC effect, demonstrated more than 25 years ago, by @StanDehaene and colleagues, easily survives a massive online replication study. We are delighted that Stan is a Fellow in our Azrieli Program on Brain, Mind, and Consciousness at @CIFAR_News @azrie
RT @StanDehaene: No replication crisis for the SNARC effect ! 26 years later, large numbers map still onto the right, and small numbers ont…
RT @StanDehaene: No replication crisis for the SNARC effect ! 26 years later, large numbers map still onto the right, and small numbers ont…
No replication crisis for the SNARC effect ! 26 years later, large numbers map still onto the right, and small numbers onto the left. The biggest SNARC study ever (N > 1000), by Krzysztof Cipora and Hans Nuerk's lab https://t.co/ke5fDgLiV6 @tuebang @
The SNARC and MARC effects measured online: Large-scale assessment methods in flexible cognitive effects https://t.co/k3f3CxNvND BehResM
RT @tuebang: Our largest SNARC (online) study ever is out with @Moji_Soli and @krzysztofcipora Main findings: 1. SNARC replicates online…
RT @krzysztofcipora: Here it is! Most likely the Biggest SNARC ever: https://t.co/02v0GpSi9B (N > 1000)
RT @krzysztofcipora: Here it is! Most likely the Biggest SNARC ever: https://t.co/02v0GpSi9B (N > 1000)
Our largest SNARC (online) study ever is out with @Moji_Soli and @krzysztofcipora Main findings: 1. SNARC replicates online with similar ES as in-lab 2. MARC replicates online with similar ES as in-lab 3. Usual validity checks (correlations with overall
@tuebang @Moji_Soli Tweeted elsewhere already, but here it is to be complete: https://t.co/02v0GpSi9B :)
Here it is! Most likely the Biggest SNARC ever: https://t.co/02v0GpSi9B (N > 1000)