↓ Skip to main content

Frequent long-distance flyer’s undesirable mileage: an organized giant thrombus stuck in PFO

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Frequent long-distance flyer’s undesirable mileage: an organized giant thrombus stuck in PFO
Published in
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11239-012-0681-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoshinori Katsumata, Kensuke Kimura, Motoaki Sano, Mikihiko Kudo, Takahide Arai, Yohei Ohno, Yuichi Tamura, Hikaru Tsuruta, Mitsushige Murata, Ryohei Yozu, Keiichi Fukuda

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 4 57%
Student > Postgraduate 2 29%
Researcher 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 4 57%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 43%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2012.
All research outputs
#2,899,390
of 3,635,018 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
#72
of 123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,278
of 230,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,635,018 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.