↓ Skip to main content

Lack of Association Between Age and Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC): a Cross-Sectional Study

Overview of attention for article published in JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Lack of Association Between Age and Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC): a Cross-Sectional Study
Published in
JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11606-019-04851-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sheharyar Minhas, Zakaria Almuwaqqat, Maira Malik, Kathie Wu, Kevin Barretto

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Student > Master 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 100%
Neuroscience 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2019.
All research outputs
#8,147,475
of 12,991,173 outputs
Outputs from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3,368
of 4,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,963
of 248,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#96
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,991,173 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.