Imaging in patients with #LBP increases costs and healthcare utilization (and delays RTW?) according this Systematic Review 👇https://t.co/VXrmgQTAQR. Do scientists need to engage with consumers & regulators to change the game?@CochraneSuisse @msk_healt
RT @McK_Institute: https://t.co/i2gTCALUCS The evidence just continues to grow: “Imaging in LBP may be associated with higher medical costs…
RT @McK_Institute: https://t.co/i2gTCALUCS The evidence just continues to grow: “Imaging in LBP may be associated with higher medical costs…
RT @McK_Institute: https://t.co/i2gTCALUCS The evidence just continues to grow: “Imaging in LBP may be associated with higher medical costs…
RT @McK_Institute: https://t.co/i2gTCALUCS The evidence just continues to grow: “Imaging in LBP may be associated with higher medical costs…
RT @McK_Institute: https://t.co/i2gTCALUCS The evidence just continues to grow: “Imaging in LBP may be associated with higher medical costs…
RT @McK_Institute: https://t.co/i2gTCALUCS The evidence just continues to grow: “Imaging in LBP may be associated with higher medical costs…
RT @McK_Institute: https://t.co/i2gTCALUCS The evidence just continues to grow: “Imaging in LBP may be associated with higher medical costs…
RT @McK_Institute: https://t.co/i2gTCALUCS The evidence just continues to grow: “Imaging in LBP may be associated with higher medical costs…
RT @McK_Institute: https://t.co/i2gTCALUCS The evidence just continues to grow: “Imaging in LBP may be associated with higher medical costs…
RT @McK_Institute: https://t.co/i2gTCALUCS The evidence just continues to grow: “Imaging in LBP may be associated with higher medical costs…
RT @McK_Institute: https://t.co/i2gTCALUCS The evidence just continues to grow: “Imaging in LBP may be associated with higher medical costs…
RT @McK_Institute: https://t.co/i2gTCALUCS The evidence just continues to grow: “Imaging in LBP may be associated with higher medical costs…
RT @McK_Institute: https://t.co/i2gTCALUCS The evidence just continues to grow: “Imaging in LBP may be associated with higher medical costs…
https://t.co/i2gTCALUCS The evidence just continues to grow: “Imaging in LBP may be associated with higher medical costs, increased healthcare utilization and more absence from work.” #Imaging #ClinicalReasoning #LBP #NotARecipe #PhysicalTherapy #McKenz… h
https://t.co/ayEqx2YQWO “Imaging (X-ray, CT and MRI) provides no health benefits for low back pain (LBP) patients and is not recommended in clinical practice guidelines. Whether imaging leads to increased costs, healthcare utilization or absence from wo… h
https://t.co/58Nn1o0Fn1 “Imaging (X-ray, CT and MRI) provides no health benefits for low back pain (LBP) patients and is not recommended in clinical practice guidelines. Whether imaging leads to increased costs, healthcare utilization or absence from wo… h
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare utilization and absence from work https://t.co/rUaHi2wWBz
RT @ProfKateDunn: #Imaging (X-ray, CT, MRI) is not recommended for low #back #pain, and a systematic review reports that it may be associat…
RT @ProfKateDunn: #Imaging (X-ray, CT, MRI) is not recommended for low #back #pain, and a systematic review reports that it may be associat…
RT @ProfKateDunn: #Imaging (X-ray, CT, MRI) is not recommended for low #back #pain, and a systematic review reports that it may be associat…
Ernesto Barrera on Twitter https://t.co/bPM21KQ6f6 Imagenes en dolor lumbar...
RT @ernestob: Pruebas de imagen (vs no pruebas) en lumbalgia -revisión sistemática [Eur Spine Jour]→La realización de pruebas de imágen pue…
Pruebas de imagen (vs no pruebas) en lumbalgia -revisión sistemática [Eur Spine Jour]→La realización de pruebas de imágen puede asociar mayores costes médicos, mayor utilización de la atención sanitaria y más ausencias del trabajo #ChoosingWisely https://t
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
@edwinderaaij @Viaperspectief @NowHealthGroup @TrustmePhysio Zeker een informatief filmpje. In mijn systematic review lijkt medische beeldvorming ook geassocieerd te zijn met meer kosten en zorgconsumenten bij lage rugklachten. https://t.co/Ox5bf64fXY
RT @ProfKateDunn: #Imaging (X-ray, CT, MRI) is not recommended for low #back #pain, and a systematic review reports that it may be associat…
RT @TimMcVicarPT: Systematic review of imaging vs no imaging for LBP. “Imaging in LBP may be associated with higher medical costs, increase…
So interesting and pertinent to the NHS in 2019 ... lets start the shift in GP surgeries
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
RT @ProfKateDunn: #Imaging (X-ray, CT, MRI) is not recommended for low #back #pain, and a systematic review reports that it may be associat…
Giuro ora basta @umbertocrainich
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
RT @TimMcVicarPT: Systematic review of imaging vs no imaging for LBP. “Imaging in LBP may be associated with higher medical costs, increase…
Systematic review of imaging vs no imaging for LBP. “Imaging in LBP may be associated with higher medical costs, increased healthcare utilization and more absence from work.” https://t.co/v39FfzDqUK
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
RT @PedroValiente83: No abusemos del las pruebas de imagen... Sólo ante criterios diagnósticos clínicos de gravedad. #noimaging #pain https…
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
これね。腰痛≠画像診断 ノットイコールとするとダメか。
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
RT @giovanni_ef: Interesting work, but difficult to evaluate the real impact on healthcare without an adequate measure of appropriateness h…
RT @giovanni_ef: Interesting work, but difficult to evaluate the real impact on healthcare without an adequate measure of appropriateness h…
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
Interesting work, but difficult to evaluate the real impact on healthcare without an adequate measure of appropriateness https://t.co/1PuS2ypjb2
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
RT @sy_littlelily: Imaging is needed when it’s needed. When you don’t need it tho then you don’t need it... 別に画像診断全否定しているつもりないですが興味深いシステマティ…
骨軟部画像診断においてlow back painは症状と画像所見が合致しない代表格と思います。
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
Imaging is needed when it’s needed. When you don’t need it tho then you don’t need it... 別に画像診断全否定しているつもりないですが興味深いシステマティックレビュー。
Still got from the press https://t.co/sy3uhDpZ6o
RT @ProfKateDunn: #Imaging (X-ray, CT, MRI) is not recommended for low #back #pain, and a systematic review reports that it may be associat…
No abusemos del las pruebas de imagen... Sólo ante criterios diagnósticos clínicos de gravedad. #noimaging #pain
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
Hard to change trends
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
RT @GijsLemmers: Just published my systematic review in The European Spine Journal! Imaging (X-ray, CT, MRI) may be associated with higher…
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
RT @GijsLemmers: Just published my systematic review in The European Spine Journal! Imaging (X-ray, CT, MRI) may be associated with higher…
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
RT @GijsLemmers: Just published my systematic review in The European Spine Journal! Imaging (X-ray, CT, MRI) may be associated with higher…
Just published my systematic review in The European Spine Journal! Imaging (X-ray, CT, MRI) may be associated with higher medical costs, increased healthcare utilization, and absence from work. Special thanks to Bart Staal, Wim va…https://t.co/civmz3r2KX
Imaging in LBP may be associated with higher medical costs, increased healthcare utilization, more absence from work and nearly no benefit https://t.co/BCd106GSXE
RT @GijsLemmers: #Imaging (X-ray, CT, MRI) is not recommended for low #back #pain. Just published my systematic review which reports that i…
#Imaging (X-ray, CT, MRI) is not recommended for low #back #pain. Just published my systematic review which reports that imaging may be associated with higher medical costs, increased healthcare utilization & more work absence https://t.co/Ox5bf6lRmy
RT @ProfKateDunn: #Imaging (X-ray, CT, MRI) is not recommended for low #back #pain, and a systematic review reports that it may be associat…
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
@ManleyJoanna
RT @ProfKateDunn: #Imaging (X-ray, CT, MRI) is not recommended for low #back #pain, and a systematic review reports that it may be associat…
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
Interesting but not particularly surprising
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…
RT @PhysioMeScience: Just published 👇👇👇 Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare ut…