↓ Skip to main content

The hazards and risks of inhaled poorly soluble particles – where do we stand after 30 years of research?

Overview of attention for article published in Particle and Fibre Toxicology, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
The hazards and risks of inhaled poorly soluble particles – where do we stand after 30 years of research?
Published in
Particle and Fibre Toxicology, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12989-019-0294-4
Authors

Paul J. A. Borm, Kevin E. Driscoll

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 75%
Other 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 25%
Chemical Engineering 1 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2019.
All research outputs
#11,879,473
of 13,396,110 outputs
Outputs from Particle and Fibre Toxicology
#304
of 398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,594
of 253,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Particle and Fibre Toxicology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,396,110 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 398 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them