↓ Skip to main content

Make-A-Dice Test: Assessing the intersection of mathematical and spatial thinking

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Research Methods, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Make-A-Dice Test: Assessing the intersection of mathematical and spatial thinking
Published in
Behavior Research Methods, February 2019
DOI 10.3758/s13428-018-01192-z
Authors

Heather Burte, Aaron L. Gardony, Allyson Hutton, Holly A. Taylor

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 57%
Researcher 2 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 6 86%
Social Sciences 1 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,010,414
of 12,980,854 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Research Methods
#228
of 1,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,932
of 248,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Research Methods
#30
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,980,854 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.