↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Motor Imagery and Visual Neurofeedback on Activation in the Swallowing Network: A Real-Time fMRI Study

Overview of attention for article published in Dysphagia (0179051X), February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Effects of Motor Imagery and Visual Neurofeedback on Activation in the Swallowing Network: A Real-Time fMRI Study
Published in
Dysphagia (0179051X), February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00455-019-09985-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silvia Erika Kober, Doris Grössinger, Guilherme Wood

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 29%
Student > Bachelor 5 21%
Student > Master 4 17%
Researcher 3 13%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 4 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Engineering 2 8%
Psychology 2 8%
Other 6 25%
Unknown 5 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2019.
All research outputs
#8,661,726
of 13,830,693 outputs
Outputs from Dysphagia (0179051X)
#673
of 842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,916
of 258,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dysphagia (0179051X)
#27
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,830,693 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.