↓ Skip to main content

Preclinical Safety Evaluation of Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Devices in Rabbits and a Novel Mini-Pig Model

Overview of attention for article published in Ophthalmology and Therapy, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Preclinical Safety Evaluation of Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Devices in Rabbits and a Novel Mini-Pig Model
Published in
Ophthalmology and Therapy, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s40123-019-0167-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ronika S. Leang, Lisa J. Kloft, Brad Gray, Arlene E. Gwon, Ling C. Huang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Engineering 2 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 10 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2019.
All research outputs
#15,562,306
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Ophthalmology and Therapy
#294
of 585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,819
of 352,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ophthalmology and Therapy
#15
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.