↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Parental Health Spillover in Cost‑Effectiveness Analysis: Evidence from Self‑Harming Adolescents in England

Overview of attention for article published in PharmacoEconomics, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Correction to: Parental Health Spillover in Cost‑Effectiveness Analysis: Evidence from Self‑Harming Adolescents in England
Published in
PharmacoEconomics, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s40273-019-00772-x
Authors

Sandy Tubeuf, Eirini-Christina Saloniki, David Cottrell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2019.
All research outputs
#10,345,972
of 12,968,588 outputs
Outputs from PharmacoEconomics
#1,076
of 1,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,335
of 248,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PharmacoEconomics
#38
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,968,588 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,285 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.