RT @PhilSciArchive: CRISPR-Cas immunity: beyond nonself and defence https://t.co/LIlNwXQSfg
CRISPR-Cas immunity: beyond nonself and defence https://t.co/LIlNwXQSfg
@luis_valentin26 Koonin has subtle opinions on the Lamarckianism of CRISPR too, we should do a journal club about this stuff. https://t.co/1cJ5xa0uFf
@theAliceRoberts @theJeremyVine A quick response! https://t.co/FPpZYxTsrJ
Mutationism, not Lamarckism, captures the novelty of CRISPR–Cas https://t.co/cCGO0Uarw9.
RT @Bio_and_Philo: Janella Baxter in @Bio_and_Philo: the story of #CRISPR-Cas is not primarily about research into fundamental biological #…
RT @Bio_and_Philo: Janella Baxter in @Bio_and_Philo: the story of #CRISPR-Cas is not primarily about research into fundamental biological #…
RT @Bio_and_Philo: Janella Baxter in @Bio_and_Philo: the story of #CRISPR-Cas is not primarily about research into fundamental biological #…
RT @Bio_and_Philo: Janella Baxter in @Bio_and_Philo: the story of #CRISPR-Cas is not primarily about research into fundamental biological #…
RT @Bio_and_Philo: Janella Baxter in @Bio_and_Philo: the story of #CRISPR-Cas is not primarily about research into fundamental biological #…
Janella Baxter in @Bio_and_Philo: the story of #CRISPR-Cas is not primarily about research into fundamental biological #mechanisms, but is instead about the intertwining of #applied and #fundamental research programs. https://t.co/UmaBRs4kel https://t.co/m
Lamarckian or not, CRISPR-Cas is an elaborate engine of directed evolution https://t.co/73JBQblqA3
So there is a philosophy-based correspondence about CRISPR -- fundamental research vs (or with) application/technology: https://t.co/lIDpHmo5GM by Janella Baxter https://t.co/NAMG6pgAFU by Eugene Koonin. I only have 2 questions from their discussion. 1/