↓ Skip to main content

In situ investigation of stone heritage sites for conservation purposes: a case study of the Székesfehérvár Ruin Garden in Hungary

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
In situ investigation of stone heritage sites for conservation purposes: a case study of the Székesfehérvár Ruin Garden in Hungary
Published in
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40645-019-0268-z
Authors

Magdalini Theodoridou, Ákos Török

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 24%
Researcher 3 12%
Unspecified 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Professor 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 9 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 4 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 12%
Unspecified 2 8%
Materials Science 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 8 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2019.
All research outputs
#10,904,492
of 14,346,625 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#222
of 309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,384
of 262,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,346,625 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 309 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them