False positives in PIRADS (V2) 3, 4, and 5 lesions: relationship with reader experience and zonal location

Overview of attention for article published in Abdominal Radiology, February 2019

Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter: 8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation: 32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley: 34 Mendeley

Summary X Dimensions citations

So far, Altmetric has seen 8 X posts from 8 X users, with an upper bound of 12,661 followers.

@CashHannes @radiolobt @JPRadtke Another nice paper on this was published 2019 in Andominal Radiology by Stolk et al. doi: https://t.co/fF03z9lvdR Fig. 3 from that publication describes exactly that finding.

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @radiolobt: False positives in PIRADS (V2) 3, 4, and 5 lesions: relationship with reader experience and zonal location "Good job Derya 👍…

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @radiolobt: False positives in PIRADS (V2) 3, 4, and 5 lesions: relationship with reader experience and zonal location "Good job Derya 👍…

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @radiolobt: False positives in PIRADS (V2) 3, 4, and 5 lesions: relationship with reader experience and zonal location "Good job Derya 👍…

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @radiolobt: False positives in PIRADS (V2) 3, 4, and 5 lesions: relationship with reader experience and zonal location "Good job Derya 👍…

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @radiolobt: False positives in PIRADS (V2) 3, 4, and 5 lesions: relationship with reader experience and zonal location "Good job Derya 👍…

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @radiolobt: False positives in PIRADS (V2) 3, 4, and 5 lesions: relationship with reader experience and zonal location "Good job Derya 👍…

Reply Repost Favourite

False positives in PIRADS (V2) 3, 4, and 5 lesions: relationship with reader experience and zonal location "Good job Derya 👍" https://t.co/zxIL7wrbbT

Reply Repost Favourite