| Title |
Understanding Girls’ Disengagement: Identifying Patterns and the Role of Teacher and Peer Support using Latent Growth Modeling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10964-019-00986-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emma C. Burns, Keiko C. P. Bostwick, Rebecca J. Collie, Andrew J. Martin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 33% |
| United States | 3 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 58% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 19% |
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 22 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 12 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 21% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2020.
All research outputs
#956,783
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#159
of 1,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,788
of 451,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#6
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,813 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.