↓ Skip to main content

“Told”: the Word Most Correlated to Negative Online Hospital Reviews

Overview of attention for article published in JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
23 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
“Told”: the Word Most Correlated to Negative Online Hospital Reviews
Published in
JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11606-019-04870-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anish K. Agarwal, Arthur P. Pelullo, Raina M. Merchant

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 25%
Unspecified 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 3 75%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2019.
All research outputs
#253,141
of 13,390,335 outputs
Outputs from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#201
of 4,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,099
of 292,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#9
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,390,335 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.