@cooler_than_0K Cet article: https://t.co/BjHXN0o1sD
RT @M_Khelfaoui: @Undercoverhist and more in this paper, in which we focused on the historical evolution of Physical Review's position in t…
@Undercoverhist and more in this paper, in which we focused on the historical evolution of Physical Review's position in the global landscape of physics journals 🙂https://t.co/BjHXN0o1sD
RT @RobertGaristo: Interesting paper on the evolution of the role of Physical Review (and PRL). "Physical Review: From the Periphery to th…
RT @RobertGaristo: Interesting paper on the evolution of the role of Physical Review (and PRL). "Physical Review: From the Periphery to th…
RT @RobertGaristo: Interesting paper on the evolution of the role of Physical Review (and PRL). "Physical Review: From the Periphery to th…
RT @RobertGaristo: Interesting paper on the evolution of the role of Physical Review (and PRL). "Physical Review: From the Periphery to th…
RT @RobertGaristo: Interesting paper on the evolution of the role of Physical Review (and PRL). "Physical Review: From the Periphery to th…
RT @RobertGaristo: Interesting paper on the evolution of the role of Physical Review (and PRL). "Physical Review: From the Periphery to th…
Interesting paper on the evolution of the role of Physical Review (and PRL). "Physical Review: From the Periphery to the Center of Physics" https://t.co/QReCA0bnA7 https://t.co/GL1PMzZJIF
あとで読もう
RT @hhayakawa: 貴重で興味深いけど、2010年以降は明らかにトレンドが変わっているので分析が甘いとも言える。 https://t.co/9U8az1SMk9
RT @hhayakawa: 貴重で興味深いけど、2010年以降は明らかにトレンドが変わっているので分析が甘いとも言える。 https://t.co/9U8az1SMk9
RT @ariga_prdgmmkr: Physical Review誌の成長についての論文、これのことか。計量書誌学的な手法で現代科学の歴史的展開を分析するのは自分も興味ある(できないけど)。https://t.co/FoLzg6laYt
貴重で興味深いけど、2010年以降は明らかにトレンドが変わっているので分析が甘いとも言える。
RT @ariga_prdgmmkr: Physical Review誌の成長についての論文、これのことか。計量書誌学的な手法で現代科学の歴史的展開を分析するのは自分も興味ある(できないけど)。https://t.co/FoLzg6laYt
RT @ariga_prdgmmkr: Physical Review誌の成長についての論文、これのことか。計量書誌学的な手法で現代科学の歴史的展開を分析するのは自分も興味ある(できないけど)。https://t.co/FoLzg6laYt
Physical Review誌の成長についての論文、これのことか。計量書誌学的な手法で現代科学の歴史的展開を分析するのは自分も興味ある(できないけど)。https://t.co/FoLzg6laYt
The #PhysicalReview in #histphys #histsci perspective https://t.co/QLeCMjZ8OA
The #PhysicalReview in #histphys #histsci perspective https://t.co/cRvfqIROtM
RT @M_Khelfaoui: How bibliometrics can be used by historians of science? An example with this paper: «Physical Review: From the Periphery t…
RT @M_Khelfaoui: How bibliometrics can be used by historians of science? An example with this paper: «Physical Review: From the Periphery t…
RT @M_Khelfaoui: How bibliometrics can be used by historians of science? An example with this paper: «Physical Review: From the Periphery t…
RT @M_Khelfaoui: How bibliometrics can be used by historians of science? An example with this paper: «Physical Review: From the Periphery t…
RT @M_Khelfaoui: How bibliometrics can be used by historians of science? An example with this paper: «Physical Review: From the Periphery t…
RT @M_Khelfaoui: How bibliometrics can be used by historians of science? An example with this paper: «Physical Review: From the Periphery t…
How bibliometrics can be used by historians of science? An example with this paper: «Physical Review: From the Periphery to the Center of Physics » https://t.co/BjHXN0o1sD @PhysicsToday https://t.co/d8HjZVjeuw