↓ Skip to main content

A novel magnetic separation oxygen-enriched method and the influence of temperature and magnetic field on enrichment

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Thermal Science, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
A novel magnetic separation oxygen-enriched method and the influence of temperature and magnetic field on enrichment
Published in
Journal of Thermal Science, March 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11630-007-0079-1
Authors

Li Wang, Jun Cai, Ping Wu, Lige Tong, Shufeng Sun

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 17%
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Master 3 17%
Professor 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 6 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 4 22%
Engineering 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Energy 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 6 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2017.
All research outputs
#5,549,211
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thermal Science
#6
of 33 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,188
of 76,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thermal Science
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one scored the same or higher as 27 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them