Philosophia has published a few articles with uh "controversial" content (read: just horrid stuff https://t.co/zPpvdnf8ir), but at least with say, Kershnar, the article(s) in question was obviously philosophical. Not so much here. So why choose to publish
@g026r @DeathCar72 @zimpenfish @BorkJurgen "Discounting the application of women relative to men is not opposed by an equally strong merit-based reason or reasons." https://t.co/JdjZCaRzUs
RT @SpringerEthics: Discounting Women’s Applications when Hiring https://t.co/6jeSZo1k8v https://t.co/LPQrmMqHFM
Discounting Women’s Applications when Hiring https://t.co/6jeSZo1k8v https://t.co/LPQrmMqHFM
RT @ProfKFH: This one is real too https://t.co/j36l3o1TpK
RT @ProfKFH: This one is real too https://t.co/j36l3o1TpK
This one is real too
So, about that Journal of Controversial Ideas . . .
RT @ErrorTheorist: Kershnar unsurprisingly still on brand https://t.co/fxsiUfinn8
RT @PhilosophiaQISR: #FirstOnline in Philosophia: Stephen Kershnar, "Discounting Women's Applications when Hiring" (2019) @SpringerPhil @…