↓ Skip to main content

Does procalcitonin have a role in the pathogenesis of nasal polyp?

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Does procalcitonin have a role in the pathogenesis of nasal polyp?
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, February 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00405-019-05326-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suat Bilici, Zehra Cinar, Ozgur Yigit, Mustafa Cakir, Enes Yigit, Hafize Uzun

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2019.
All research outputs
#3,425,916
of 13,370,991 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#121
of 1,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,196
of 290,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#3
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,370,991 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,695 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,824 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.