↓ Skip to main content

Towards a theoretical foundation for morphological computation with compliant bodies

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Cybernetics, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Towards a theoretical foundation for morphological computation with compliant bodies
Published in
Biological Cybernetics, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00422-012-0471-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helmut Hauser, Auke J. Ijspeert, Rudolf M. Füchslin, Rolf Pfeifer, Wolfgang Maass

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Switzerland 3 2%
Germany 3 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 164 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 26%
Student > Master 31 17%
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 10%
Unspecified 17 9%
Other 46 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 75 41%
Computer Science 37 20%
Unspecified 25 14%
Physics and Astronomy 12 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 6%
Other 24 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2019.
All research outputs
#6,796,701
of 13,278,410 outputs
Outputs from Biological Cybernetics
#358
of 528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,948
of 337,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Cybernetics
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,278,410 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 528 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them