↓ Skip to main content

Eliciting patient-important outcomes through group brainstorming: when is saturation reached?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Eliciting patient-important outcomes through group brainstorming: when is saturation reached?
Published in
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s41687-019-0097-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marianna LaNoue, Alexzandra Gentsch, Amy Cunningham, Geoffrey Mills, Amanda M. B. Doty, Judd E. Hollander, Brendan G. Carr, Larry Loebell, Gail Weingarten, Kristin L. Rising

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 4 20%
Researcher 4 20%
Student > Master 3 15%
Professor 3 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 15%
Social Sciences 2 10%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2019.
All research outputs
#6,621,908
of 24,372,222 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#124
of 584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,665
of 445,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,372,222 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.