@osilander This is a good comparison of error correction software. I found FMLRC through it, which is a great tool. https://t.co/O1Ep9k7If4
A comparative evaluation of hybrid error correction methods for error-prone long reads https://t.co/BYJvPWSrGF
A comparative evaluation of hybrid error correction methods for error-prone long reads https://t.co/shGM481saq
RT @Yuxuan_Yuan: A comparative evaluation of hybrid error correction methods for error-prone long reads https://t.co/ZFmScSQpWZ
RT @Yuxuan_Yuan: A comparative evaluation of hybrid error correction methods for error-prone long reads https://t.co/ZFmScSQpWZ
A comparative evaluation of hybrid error correction methods for error-prone long reads https://t.co/ZFmScSQpWZ
A comparative evaluation of hybrid error correction methods for error-prone long reads https://t.co/4oAGBnUIJy
A comparative evaluation of hybrid error correction methods for error-prone long reads https://t.co/aQmbM8QfX5
"the difficulty of installation and software implementation cannot be quantified but is also a critical issue for the practical application of these methods" x10000 https://t.co/uAh45I1hRe
RT @tangming2005: A comparative evaluation of hybrid error correction methods for error-prone long reads https://t.co/UdaGebGv0n
Bookmarking,
RT @GenomeBiology: Fu, Wang and Au compare the performances of 10 error correction approaches for long reads (both Oxford Nanopore and PacB…
A comparative evaluation of hybrid error correction methods for error-prone long reads https://t.co/yJcaoXM7xv
RT @GinaPham: A comparative evaluation of hybrid error correction methods for error-prone long reads https://t.co/SjJhBbjpEa
RT @tangming2005: A comparative evaluation of hybrid error correction methods for error-prone long reads https://t.co/UdaGebGv0n
RT @GenomeBiology: Fu, Wang and Au compare the performances of 10 error correction approaches for long reads (both Oxford Nanopore and PacB…
RT @tangming2005: A comparative evaluation of hybrid error correction methods for error-prone long reads https://t.co/UdaGebGv0n
RT @tangming2005: A comparative evaluation of hybrid error correction methods for error-prone long reads https://t.co/UdaGebGv0n
RT @tangming2005: A comparative evaluation of hybrid error correction methods for error-prone long reads https://t.co/UdaGebGv0n
A comparative evaluation of hybrid error correction methods for error-prone long reads https://t.co/UdaGebGv0n
RT @GenomeBiology: Fu, Wang and Au compare the performances of 10 error correction approaches for long reads (both Oxford Nanopore and PacB…
RT @GinaPham: A comparative evaluation of hybrid error correction methods for error-prone long reads https://t.co/SjJhBbjpEa
A comparative evaluation of hybrid error correction methods for error-prone long reads https://t.co/SjJhBbjpEa
A comparative evaluation of hybrid error correction methods for error-prone long reads https://t.co/ZbBYOQxnSN
RT @GenomeBiology: Fu, Wang and Au compare the performances of 10 error correction approaches for long reads (both Oxford Nanopore and PacB…
RT @GenomeBiology: Fu, Wang and Au compare the performances of 10 error correction approaches for long reads (both Oxford Nanopore and PacB…
RT @GenomeBiology: Fu, Wang and Au compare the performances of 10 error correction approaches for long reads (both Oxford Nanopore and PacB…
RT @GenomeBiology: Fu, Wang and Au compare the performances of 10 error correction approaches for long reads (both Oxford Nanopore and PacB…
RT @GenomeBiology: Fu, Wang and Au compare the performances of 10 error correction approaches for long reads (both Oxford Nanopore and PacB…
RT @GenomeBiology: Fu, Wang and Au compare the performances of 10 error correction approaches for long reads (both Oxford Nanopore and PacB…
RT @GenomeBiology: Fu, Wang and Au compare the performances of 10 error correction approaches for long reads (both Oxford Nanopore and PacB…
RT @GenomeBiology: Fu, Wang and Au compare the performances of 10 error correction approaches for long reads (both Oxford Nanopore and PacB…
RT @GenomeBiology: Fu, Wang and Au compare the performances of 10 error correction approaches for long reads (both Oxford Nanopore and PacB…
RT @GenomeBiology: Fu, Wang and Au compare the performances of 10 error correction approaches for long reads (both Oxford Nanopore and PacB…
@surt_lab @nanopore Also there is this: https://t.co/tT1V0m1VnO
RT @GenomeBiology: Fu, Wang and Au compare the performances of 10 error correction approaches for long reads (both Oxford Nanopore and PacB…
RT @GenomeBiology: Fu, Wang and Au compare the performances of 10 error correction approaches for long reads (both Oxford Nanopore and PacB…
RT @GenomeBiology: Fu, Wang and Au compare the performances of 10 error correction approaches for long reads (both Oxford Nanopore and PacB…
RT @GenomeBiology: Fu, Wang and Au compare the performances of 10 error correction approaches for long reads (both Oxford Nanopore and PacB…
RT @GenomeBiology: Fu, Wang and Au compare the performances of 10 error correction approaches for long reads (both Oxford Nanopore and PacB…
Fu, Wang and Au compare the performances of 10 error correction approaches for long reads (both Oxford Nanopore and PacBio). https://t.co/4vk5PtphzU