Title |
How can interventions that target forest-goers be tailored to accelerate malaria elimination in the Greater Mekong Subregion? A systematic review of the qualitative literature
|
---|---|
Published in |
Malaria Journal, February 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12936-019-2666-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Stephanie D. Nofal, Thomas J. Peto, Bipin Adhikari, Rupam Tripura, James Callery, Thanh Mai Bui, Lorenz von Seidlein, Christopher Pell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 8 | 35% |
Thailand | 3 | 13% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
Germany | 1 | 4% |
Indonesia | 1 | 4% |
Australia | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 7 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 65% |
Scientists | 7 | 30% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 101 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 16 | 16% |
Student > Master | 15 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
Other | 10 | 10% |
Unknown | 39 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 19% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
Other | 14 | 14% |
Unknown | 47 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,784,365
of 24,744,050 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#306
of 5,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,238
of 448,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#5
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,744,050 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.