↓ Skip to main content

Delayed Colo-anal Anastomosis for Rectal Cancer: Pelvic Morbidity, Functional Results and Oncological Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Delayed Colo-anal Anastomosis for Rectal Cancer: Pelvic Morbidity, Functional Results and Oncological Outcomes: A Systematic Review
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00268-019-04918-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giuseppe Portale, George Octavian Popesc, Matteo Parotto, Francesco Cavallin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 25%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 75%
Unspecified 1 13%
Engineering 1 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,306,018
of 13,396,110 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#402
of 2,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,098
of 287,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#23
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,396,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.