Title |
Do patients consider computer-adaptive measures more appropriate than static questionnaires?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s41687-019-0096-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eva-Maria Gamper, Caroline Martini, Morten Aagaard Petersen, Irene Virgolini, Bernhard Holzner, Johannes M. Giesinger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Austria | 1 | 14% |
Brazil | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 20% |
Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
Professor | 2 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 24% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 12% |
Psychology | 2 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 8% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 16% |
Unknown | 7 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2019.
All research outputs
#5,947,235
of 23,125,690 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#104
of 508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,632
of 438,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,125,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 508 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.