↓ Skip to main content

Light limitation and partial mycoheterotrophy in rhizoctonia-associated orchids

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Light limitation and partial mycoheterotrophy in rhizoctonia-associated orchids
Published in
Oecologia, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00442-019-04340-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julienne M.-I. Schweiger, Christian Kemnade, Martin I. Bidartondo, Gerhard Gebauer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Student > Master 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 60%
Environmental Science 2 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,841,756
of 13,165,983 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#382
of 2,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,981
of 276,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#27
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,165,983 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,826 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.