| Title |
Sensitivity Study of Cancer Antigens (CA-125) Detection Using Interdigitated Electrodes Under Microfluidic Flow Condition
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioNanoScience, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12668-018-0589-1 |
| Authors |
Bharath Babu Nunna, Debdyuti Mandal, Joo Un Lee, Shiqiang Zhuang, Eon Soo Lee |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 17% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 4 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 17% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2019.
All research outputs
#744,708
of 23,124,001 outputs
Outputs from BioNanoScience
#3
of 119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,873
of 438,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioNanoScience
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,124,001 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them