↓ Skip to main content

Historical Archaeology in Africa: An Appropriate Concept?

Overview of attention for article published in African Archaeological Review, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Historical Archaeology in Africa: An Appropriate Concept?
Published in
African Archaeological Review, May 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10437-007-9014-9
Authors

Graham Connah

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 8%
United States 2 5%
Australia 1 3%
Finland 1 3%
South Africa 1 3%
Slovenia 1 3%
Israel 1 3%
Unknown 29 74%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Other 9 23%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 21 54%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Linguistics 1 3%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 7 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,731,211
of 23,515,383 outputs
Outputs from African Archaeological Review
#135
of 358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,713
of 72,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from African Archaeological Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,515,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them