↓ Skip to main content

Design principles for establishing a multi-sided open innovation platform: lessons learned from an action research study in the medical technology industry

Overview of attention for article published in Electronic Markets, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
Title
Design principles for establishing a multi-sided open innovation platform: lessons learned from an action research study in the medical technology industry
Published in
Electronic Markets, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12525-018-0325-2
Authors

Christofer F. Daiberl, Sascha Julian Oks, Angela Roth, Kathrin M. Möslein, Steven Alter

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 143 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 15%
Student > Master 18 13%
Researcher 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 49 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 40 28%
Computer Science 12 8%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Engineering 8 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 5%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 52 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2019.
All research outputs
#4,575,369
of 25,410,626 outputs
Outputs from Electronic Markets
#60
of 646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,885
of 446,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Electronic Markets
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,410,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.