↓ Skip to main content

Design principles for establishing a multi-sided open innovation platform: lessons learned from an action research study in the medical technology industry

Overview of attention for article published in Electronic Markets, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 337)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Design principles for establishing a multi-sided open innovation platform: lessons learned from an action research study in the medical technology industry
Published in
Electronic Markets, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12525-018-0325-2
Authors

Christofer F. Daiberl, Sascha Julian Oks, Angela Roth, Kathrin M. Möslein, Steven Alter

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 25%
Student > Bachelor 3 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 25%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 17%
Unspecified 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 3 25%
Computer Science 2 17%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 17%
Unspecified 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Other 3 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,027,170
of 13,297,120 outputs
Outputs from Electronic Markets
#9
of 337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,241
of 282,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Electronic Markets
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,297,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 337 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.